![]() The underlying concepts of how a car "works" for these are so outdated that they're almost completely irrelevant. Given all that, there are still some important points to keep in mind. Asking them to resist the force of slowly rolling down any slope, no matter how steep, is trivial. Those pads are designed bring your car to a screaming stop from 50+mph to zero in a matter of seconds. If you're actually on a steep hill, then engaging the hand-brake is - again, in principle - a more reliable option, since you're now relying on your brake pads to stop your wheels from spinning at all. (Again, the exact implementation completely depends on the specific model of car.) Locking it in place is pretty much the same as if you stomped down like that, and then just sat there like that for a couple of hours. Pulling on it engages the brake pads on each wheel, as if you were stomping on the brake. This is basically just a second brake pedal. (And if your car is less than 20 years old, there's a good chance it wouldn't make any difference at all.) Using the Parking/Emergency Brake ![]() Engaging the hand-brake is completely redundant. If you're on anything but a steep hill, then putting your car in "Park" is just fine. ![]() (Exact approach on how that works depends on the specific model of car.) That means that your wheels are still free to roll - even on a steep hill - and you're relying on that transmission-locking mechanism to resist moving. This locks your central transmission into a fixed state, by mechanically freezing the clutch. Again, the final result, is a no-audio, 1920 x 1080.not sure frame rate, VLC says some crazy number like 46.3432, that retains quality and can be reliably keyed, and renders out the fastest that After Effects CS5 (or 5.5, don't remember, it's the clients) will allow, because my client needs to be able to compare compositions against each other and stuff.Īlso, I asked CC, but figured I'd get faster responses here.The two options enable two completely different systems - in principle, at least, Putting your car in "Park" Quicktime HDV1080p24 MPEG-2 (WE MIGHT HAVE A WINNER) 600MB Quicktime MPEG-4 VIDEO (NO, BLURRY QUALITY PIXELS, LOOKS LIKE H.264 RESULT) 28MB) Quicktime TIFF Codec (NO, LOST TOO MUCH QUALITY, ALL TILING AND PIXELATED) 10-FRICKEN-GB Quicktime H.264 (NO, BLURRY QUALITY PIXELS) 37MB Quicktime Cinepak (NO, SO MUCH QUALITY LOSS THAT IT LOOKS LIKE A 256 GIF PAINTING NOW) 600MB Quicktime Animation (NO, LOST TOO MUCH QUALITY, ALL TILING AND PIXELATED) 5GB Quicktime ProRes422 : (SEEMS QUALITY RETAINED, FILE SIZE TRIPLES THOUGH) 2GB Quicktime PNG Codec (NO, LOSS QUALITY BAD) I forget the size, deleted it. Note that the source MTS is 500MB, and 4 mins. I've tried using Adobe Media Encoder to try out these formats. (Also the greenscreen needs to retain data to be keyed out) So I suggested we find a way to compress them, while still keeping the quality. ![]() There's also no audio.Īfter Effects WILL work with MTS, but it runs really slow and was going to take hours just to render out 10 seconds. It's more of an effect, than a movie, so we're working completely in After Effects, no need to go back to any NLE. Basically it's HD slow motion photography, shot sideways, against a greenscreen, and all he wants to do is put one 1920 x 1080 composition up against another (they are rotated 90 degrees), have em move in the slow motion he shot them as, and fade out to another. I have a client who gave me nothing but MTS files to use in After Effects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |